Home Books King of Kings: The Iranian Revolution—A Story of …

King of Kings: The Iranian Revolution—A Story of Hubris, Delusion and Catastrophic Miscalculation

King of Kings: The Iranian Revolution—A Story of Hubris, Delusion and Catastrophic Miscalculation

by Scott Anderson

Doubleday ·2025 ·481 pages ·History
Top of the Pile
Top of the Pile
I Index
86/99
Top of the Pile

78/99

Critics

Top of the Pile

94/99

Readers

n/a

Scholars

59/99

Rating

97/99

Volume

94/99

Rating

93/99

Volume

Sign in to add to your shelf, rate, or review this book.


About This Book

From the author of the acclaimed New York Times bestseller Lawrence in Arabia, a stunningly revelatory narrative history of one of the most momentous events in modern times, the jaw-dropping stupidity of the American government, and the dawn of the age of religious nationalism. On November 16th, 1977, at a state dinner in the White House, President Jimmy Carter toasted Shah Mohammad Reza Pahlavi, King of Kings, Light of the Aryans, Shadow of God on Earth, praising his "enlightened leadership" and extolling Iran as "a stabilizing influence in that part of the world." Iran had the world's fifth largest army and was awash in billions of dollars in oil revenues. Construction cranes dotted the skyline of its booming capital, Tehran. The regime's feared secret police force SAVAK had crushed communist opposition, and the Shah had bought off the conservative Muslim clergy inside the country. He seemed invulnerable, and invaluable to the United States as an ally in the Cold War. Fourteen months later the Shah fled Iran into exile, forced from the throne by a volcanic religious revolution led by a fiery cleric named Ayatollah Khomeini. How could the United States, which had one of the largest CIA stations in the world and thousands of military personnel in Iran, have been so blind? The spellbinding story Scott Anderson weaves is one of a dictator oblivious to the disdain of his subjects and a superpower blundering into disaster. The Shah emerges as a fascinating, Shakespearean character - a wannabe Richard III unaware of the depth of dissent to his rule, indecisive like Hamlet when action was called for, and at the end Lear-like as he raged against his fate. The Americans made terrible decisions at almost every juncture, from a secret pact designed by Kissinger and Nixon, to dismissing reports from the one diplomat who saw how hated the Shah was by the Iranian people (unlike almost all his colleagues, he spoke Farsi), to Jimmy Carter allowing the Shah to come to America for medical treatment, which set off the hostage crisis which forever damaged American influence in the world. Scott Anderson tells this astonishing tale with the narrative brio, mordant wit, and keen analysis that made his bestselling Lawrence in Arabia one of the key texts in understanding the modern Middle East. Based on voluminous research and dozens of interviews, King of Kings is driven by penetrating portraits of the people involved - the Iranian-American doctor who convinced American officials Khomeini was a moderate; the American teacher who learned of Khomeini's influence long before the cleric was even mentioned in official reports; the Shah's court minister who kept a detailed diary of all their interactions; the Shah's wife Farah who still mourns her lost kingdom; the hypocritical and misguided Jimmy Carter; and the implacable Khomeini who outmaneuvered his foes at every turn. The Iranian Revolution, Anderson convincingly argues, was as world-shattering an event as the French and Russian revolutions. In the Middle East, in India, in Southeast Asia, in Europe, and now in the United States, the hatred of economically-marginalized, religiously-fervent masses for a wealthy secular elite has led to violence and upheaval - and Iran was the template. King of Kings is a bravura work of history, and a warning.


Preview


Reviews

"This is an exceptional and important book."

Mark Bowden· The New York Times Read review ↗ Top of the Pile

"An illuminating, operatic depiction of the revolution as a farcical cavalcade of arrogant mistakes with dire consequences."

Publishers Weekly Read review ↗ Top of the Pile

"Anderson succeeds precisely because he eschews structural, quasi-philosophical queries for an energetic account that concerns itself with, as he puts it, 'a few core questions' ..."

Arash Azizi· The Atlantic Read review ↗ Top of the Pile

"Lalami is a subtle polemicist, which is to say that she doles out Sara's pain and depredation by degrees so that it never feels contrived or sensational ..."

Sue Halpern· New York Review of Books Read review ↗ Top of the Pile

"A sweeping, gripping book, one that makes past times and dead people (often weird, complex and evil) spring to life with its narrative verve and attention to detail ..."

Tunku Varadarajan· The Wall Street Journal Top of the Pile

"Anderson is very good on the many American personalities who were on the scene."

Richard Overy· The Telegraph (UK) Read review ↗ Top of the Pile

Reader Reviews

0 reviews

Sign in to write a review.

No reader reviews yet. Be the first!